International Study Group of Liver Surgery
Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)
Consensus statement · Tier 2, Specialist societies · INTERNATIONAL · 2011
Current — checked with the publisher on 2026-09-01
DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001
https://adjumed.com/download/HSM_Suppl_5_liver_failure.pdf
What this platform has drawn from it — 9 claims
- The International Study Group of Liver Surgery defines post-hepatectomy liver failure as a postoperatively acquired deterioration in the liver's ability to maintain its synthetic, excretory and detoxifying functions, characterised by an increased INR together with concomitant hyperbilirubinaemia on or after postoperative day 5.
Results, 'Consensus definition of posthepatectomy liver failure', p. 715
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - The ISGLS definition sets no general numeric thresholds: increased INR and hyperbilirubinaemia are defined against the normal cut-off levels of the local laboratory, and other obvious causes of the biochemical and clinical changes, such as biliary obstruction, must be excluded.
Results, 'Consensus definition of posthepatectomy liver failure', p. 715, sentence following the definition · Table II, Definition row, p. 719
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - Where INR or serum bilirubin is already raised before operation, ISGLS post-hepatectomy liver failure is defined instead by an increasing INR and increasing serum bilirubin on or after postoperative day 5, compared with the previous day's values.
Table II, Definition row, p. 719
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - The ISGLS definition also treats the need for clotting factors such as fresh frozen plasma to maintain a normal INR on or after postoperative day 5, in combination with hyperbilirubinaemia, as post-hepatectomy liver failure.
Results, 'Consensus definition of posthepatectomy liver failure', p. 715
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - ISGLS grades post-hepatectomy liver failure by the worst criterion identified: fulfilling at least one criterion of non-invasive or invasive intervention classifies a patient as grade B or grade C respectively.
Results, 'Grading of severity of posthepatectomy liver failure', p. 715
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - ISGLS grade A post-hepatectomy liver failure is a postoperative deterioration of liver function that does not require a change in the patient's clinical management.
Results, 'Grading of severity of posthepatectomy liver failure', grade A
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - ISGLS grade B post-hepatectomy liver failure is diagnosed where there is a deviation from the regular postoperative clinical pathway that can be managed without invasive treatment; non-invasive treatment may include fresh frozen plasma, albumin, daily diuretics and non-invasive ventilation.
Results, 'Grading of severity of posthepatectomy liver failure', grade B
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - ISGLS grade C post-hepatectomy liver failure is diagnosed where an invasive procedure is required; the invasive procedures named are haemodialysis, intubation and mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal liver support, rescue hepatectomy and transplantation.
Results, 'Grading of severity of posthepatectomy liver failure', grade C
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure - The ISGLS states that a uniform definition of post-hepatectomy liver failure was needed to enable valid comparison of results between studies across institutions and countries.
Introduction, p. 714
read on Post-hepatectomy liver failure
How this record was checked, and what is doubtful about it
READ IN FULL FOR THE FIRST TIME IN PHASE 16, having been cited and unread since Phase 1. Surgery 2011;149(5):713-724, doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001. ACCESS: eight routes were attempted and seven failed - ScienceDirect (paywall), linkinghub (JavaScript stub), surgjournal.com (403), PubMed (cookie wall), the HKU and Adelaide institutional repositories (500 and JS shell), and web.archive.org (blocked here). ResearchGate was excluded by instruction and never fetched. The working route was a copy re-hosted by the Swiss surgical quality body AQC, now adjumed.com. It is the publisher's own typeset PDF, not a preprint: it carries the Surgery running heads, the citation line '(Surgery 2011;149:713-24.)', 'Accepted for publication October 18, 2010', the Mosby copyright line and the DOI, and both agents independently confirmed the printed page numbers. The mirror is the retrieval route; the citation readers see is the journal and DOI.
Verification: verified · last accessed 2026-09-01 · status checked against https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21236455/